Video Game Addiction and the Gospel – Chapter 2: Numbing the Pain

Addiction is man’s failed attempt to build heaven on earth. Because, let’s face it, this world is broken. It is filled with death, suffering, disease, aging, accidents, poverty, famine, natural disasters, hopelessness, depression, suicide, cancer, unemployment, discouragement, failed relationships, cheating spouses, failing grades, terrible bosses, dead-end jobs, rush-hour traffic, oppressive taxes, debt, insurance companies, war, terrorist attacks, slavery, evil governments, criminals, gambling, stealing, substance abuse, economic crashes, homelessness, and obesity. We know inherently that this was not the way it was meant to be. We were made for so much more than this. The evil that exists in the world is caused by man’s rebellion against God and his perfect law. We are broken because of sin and are born into a world at war with God. We turn to idols in a fallen world thinking that they can bring us lasting satisfaction and joy when only God can. Addiction is a coping mechanism to numb the pain of life and the consequences of our sins rather than repenting of them.

At its heart, addiction is an eschatological problem. Eschatology is the Christian doctrine of the future and the second coming of Christ. People fall into addiction because they believe they have no future, no hope, no purpose, no meaning in life, no friends, no family, and nothing worth living for except the release of the next high. No child ever wakes up and says to himself, “I want to become a drug addict when I grow up.” Rather, addiction develops over time as a response to the pain of life and as a way to find lasting satisfaction. As C. S. Lewis observed, human history is “the long terrible story of man trying to find something other than God which will make him happy.”[1] The first step to recovery is to admit that you have a problem and stop trying to find something apart from God that will give you perfect happiness.

Living as a Hikikomori

A hikikomori is a person who withdraws from the rest of the world and isolates himself from others. There are thousands of hikikomori living in Japan who are paralyzed by fear of the future. They choose to stay indoors because of the anxiety of meeting others, facing failure, working at a job, or going to school. We live in a world where the youth are stressed out about the future and cannot cope with the heavy demands and expectations that are required of them. Given the diminishing prospects of finding a good job, they give up ever trying to find one. They believe their condition is hopeless and that it is futile to even try. For those who do try, they often take extreme measures to ensure success such as studying while hooked up to IVs to help their concentration.[2] Their identity is tied to their success as a student and failure is not an option.

But what happens when you do fail? If your identity as a person is determined by your grades and job prospects, then failing in them results in hopeless depression. This is why many teenagers commit suicide because they believe their life is a failure because they do not meet the arbitrary standards that have been placed on them.[3] Others, instead of killing themselves, withdraw from society and become hikikomori. They may still be alive, but they are dead to the world. Video game addiction is often associated with this withdrawal because it gives them a sense of satisfaction that they cannot get from the real world which they believe has rejected them.

I know firsthand what this feels like. After graduating from seminary, I was paralyzed by the fear of never being able to find a ministry position because I am not married. The competition for pastoral positions is extremely competitive with the average church going through eighty resumes over the period of eight months before finding a pastor. Why would any church ever hire me when there are multitudes of people with more experience than me who are married? If two pastoral candidates are equally qualified and one is married and the other is not, the one who is married is almost always going to get the job. So many pastors have fallen into sexual immorality that singleness is seen as too great a risk for churches to take.

Even after I knew I wanted to write a book on video game addiction, I have been rejected many times because I am not married. Two weeks before I was scheduled to preach in view of a call at a church in Kansas, the church voted to reject my candidacy because I am not married. Even though they did not know me personally, they were afraid that I could not handle myself appropriately around the single women of their community.

When I was in college, a professor once said to me after I told her that I wanted to go into the ministry, “Well, you’re going to be as poor as a church mouse aren’t you.” And here I was, without a job and living in an apartment with cockroaches despite my amazing academic achievements. Before I was called to preach to others, I wanted to be a medical doctor. Imagine how much money I could be making and how much I could give away to support world missions! In my sinfulness, I was bitter toward God and frustrated with myself which only made me more unhappy, anxious, and depressed. This created in me a fear of godly men for my laziness and lack of love for others. I did not want to be rebuked for my sin and did not believe that anyone could help me.

My depression because of my circumstances displayed an incredible lack of trust in God. The irony here is that I was a strong believer in the sovereignty of God over all things. If God had called me into ministry, he would provide a way for me and it was my obligation to pursue the use of means to accomplish that end. God’s sovereignty, rightly understood, is one of the greatest blessings for the Christian. I should have sought out the wisdom and counsel of others instead of isolating myself and listening to the lies of Satan that kept me depressed and without hope for change. But today, I am a doctor of souls as I serve as a missionary and pastor in Nevada. In comparison to others, I may be as poor as a church mouse, but I have become rich beyond all splendor in Christ.

The Allure of Video Game Addiction

And here’s where video game addiction comes in: gaming provided an outlet for me to achieve a temporary sense of satisfaction in spite of circumstances that I believed were beyond my control. I could not control what search committees and employers thought of me, but I could control my destiny in the games I played. Completing achievements, increasing my gamerscore, and beating games on the hardest difficulty temporarily filled the void in my soul that longed for satisfaction and identity. The release of dopamine that corresponded with accomplishing goals in the games I was playing numbed the pain of my lack of fulfillment.

Video games gave me an identity with a unique gamertag and virtual trophies for which I could be proud. But addiction to video games is a vicious cycle: the joy caused by the release of dopamine wears off and the addict must go in search of new games to play in a vain attempt to find lasting satisfaction. This makes gaming an expensive hobby because in order to play the best games, you must own every game console since each console has games that are exclusive to it. Every addiction has its price and some are more expensive than others. The pleasure that comes from drugs is so powerful that people are willing to blow thousands of dollars on them in a single day. All sin is irrational and self-destructive. The drugs that promise us pleasure end up killing us or leaving us empty. While video game addiction may not be as expensive as drug addiction, it kills time which is the most valuable thing we have.

Video Games Save Lives

One night when I was staying up late playing Gears of War 2, I received a message from one of my friends on Xbox Live telling me that he was going to kill himself because his girlfriend had broken up with him and that there was no point in keeping him on my friends list. In a state of panic, I sent him a message telling him that I wanted to talk. He replied and I gave him a listening ear as he told me his story. His girlfriend had told him to “kill himself” and he decided to do it out of spite as a way to get back at her. This woman had been his life and now he didn’t know how he could live without her. I told him that one day he would look back on this moment and laugh at how silly the idea of killing himself was when there are so many other women out there. I reminded him of all the people who loved him, warned him of hell, told him about Jesus, and instructed him to contact a Christian pastor who could help him. At the end of the conversation, he told me that he was not going to kill himself and we have played together many times since that day.

But here’s the thing, if I had not been addicted to video games at that moment, I would have been asleep because gaming was destroying my sleeping schedule. If I had not been playing video games at that time, my friend might be dead now. Does that mean video game addiction is a good thing? No, it means that even in the midst of my sin God still wanted to use me. We cannot comprehend the providence of God and are called to be faithful to the revealed will of God in Scripture. It is true that if I had never fallen into video game addiction this book would not exist, but that is no excuse for my sin. The same is true for others who have overcome their addictions and are using their experience to help others who are in bondage to the same sins they once were.

Video Games and Depression

The relationship between video games and depression is paradoxical. On the one hand, there are many testimonies from people who have overcome depression because of video games. Gaming gave them confidence to meet others, conquer challenges in real life, and do hard things. On the other hand, video game addiction can exacerbate the depression by allowing people to ignore the root cause of the depression. Video games both attract people who are depressed and cause depression for those who become addicted to them.[4]

We see a similar phenomenon in the explosion of adult coloring books. Entertainment allows people to take the focus off their problems and forget about the pain of life. While consuming these fun activities, they can empty their minds and not worry about tomorrow. But we are not called to forget about our pain, but to bring our pain and suffering to God in prayer (Ps 50:15). He alone can take the burden off our back and give us purpose and meaning in life. Entertainment cannot give us lasting satisfaction because we must go back to it again and again after the high wears off.

And people are not just addicted to video games, they are addicted to breaking news about new games that are coming out. When a new game is announced, game forums and comment sections go crazy in anticipation of playing it. But when the game finally comes out, it rarely lives up to the hype and expectations surrounding it. After the game has been fully consumed and all the achievements have been completed, a pervading feeling of emptiness comes over the addict. Then people complain about the game and reminisce in the nostalgia of the previous games in the franchise and how they were so much better than the new one (Eccles 7:10).[5]

The Shame of Video Game Addiction

Video game addiction brings with it a unique form of shame. I do not believe there is anything shameful in video games themselves, but gaming is shameful when it becomes an obsession and interferes with real-world responsibilities. Gaming accomplishments, whether they be virtual or real, are not worth sacrificing your family or job for. Video game achievements can’t be put on a résumé unless you are applying to be a video game reviewer. Why should something so trivial consume your life?

There is an awkwardness when adults play video games because we think that video games are just toys for children. It would be awkward to see a thirty-year-old playing with toys designed for toddlers for hours on end. When children play games that are made for them, there is no shame in it. Gaming has evolved beyond being toys for children and now games are made specifically for people who do not have the time they once had to have their life consumed by them. This can promote a kind of extended adolescence where the maturation of the content in the games is designed to blunt the force of the awkwardness that comes from adults playing them for extended periods of time.

But Christians are called to be mature in their faith and conduct. As Paul says, “When I was a child, I spoke like a child, I thought like a child, I reasoned like a child. When I became a man, I gave up childish ways” (1 Cor 13:11). As mature men and women, we do not have the time to waste our lives by indulging in entertainment that takes our focus off the calling we have been given by God. If we are seeking to find our treasure, joy, and happiness in any form of entertainment, we have made our pleasure an idol that we must turn from in repentance. All sin brings with it shame, guilt, and fear. And each type of sin has a unique manifestation of these three consequences of sin.

Jesus perfectly embodied what it means to be a man and demonstrated true headship by serving others and laying down his life to provide eternal life for all who follow him. Jesus made provision for his bride by his death and we as men are called to provide for others by working hard and dying to our own self-interests. We are called to deny ourselves and follow after Christ who served others gladly in perfect obedience to his Father (Matt 16:24). If that means we have to put away video games to focus on providing for and loving our family, then so be it.

God has created us to work. Through our labor, we accomplish goals and find satisfaction in using our gifts to fulfill the calling God has given us. We are therefore miserable unless we are actively working to fulfill the calling God has given to us. To do otherwise is to live contrary to the purpose for which we were made. Living outside of God’s purpose for us can never bring lasting joy or satisfaction. When we are unable or unwilling to work, we create replacement callings to numb the misery we are experiencing from not working to provide for ourselves. And even if we are working, if our work is not satisfying to us, video games offer the promise of satisfaction through completing artificial tasks and challenges that we make for ourselves. In the land of video games, we can be our own boss, set our own schedule, and choose for ourselves which challenges to tackle to maximize that sense of accomplishment we so desperately crave.

A Real Drug Addiction

I have learned much about addiction from the time I have spent preaching the gospel to homeless men and women in Houston, TX. Contrary to popular belief, most homeless people who are drug addicts did not become homeless because of a drug addiction, but they became drug addicts after becoming homeless to numb the pain of their seemingly hopeless condition. It is the same with mental illness. It is not so much that people become homeless because of mental illness, but that they develop mental illnesses because of the horrible condition they find themselves in. The drugs and mental illness are a result of a loss of purpose and identity. And the same was true with me except that I replaced drugs with compulsive gaming. 

The difference was I didn’t realize that I was suffering from a drug addiction. The dopamine released from accomplishing goals in gaming was my drug to fill the emptiness I was experiencing. But the lack of lasting satisfaction only fueled a greater addiction for playing more games. The wide variety of games to choose from is like the variety found in the different types of drugs you can buy. Each gamer has a different taste in what games bring him the highest release of dopamine. Discovering which game franchises and genres bring the most satisfaction is part of the draw of video game addiction. When you get bored of one type of game, you can just move on to another. By constantly alternating between games, it is possible to never get bored.

Our society is medicating itself to death and each addict has his own drug of choice. Pharmaceutical companies are making a killing off selling antidepressants that never address the real reason behind the depression.[6] The thing about pain numbing is that there is no incentive to try it if everything in your life is going great. But when hardship comes, our real self is exposed. How we respond to adversity reveals the true condition of our heart. Will we flee from God to drugs or will we flee from sin to God? All addiction is sinful because it is enslaving and controlling. To be enslaved by anything is sinful in God’s sight (1 Cor 6:12). Addiction is a self-inflicted wound that can only bring us harm.[7] As Jeffrey D. Johnson elaborates:

“We have traded hope for despondency, life for death, meaning for emptiness, truth for nihilism, love for selfishness, and God for a bowl of Esau’s soup. But the exchange cost us everything. We wanted to be left alone, and now we have discovered the desolation of our own isolation. We were naïve to think we could travel alone and not feel lonely and miserable when we finally arrived at our destination. But here we are – addicted to our psychotropic, antidepressant medications. . . . With God pushed aside, external values and meaning are pushed aside as well. How to live and what to live for are not questions that have external answers. Mankind is left alone to discover or create these answers. ‘If God is dead,’ then, Muggeridge concluded, ‘somebody is going to have to take his pace. It will be megalomania or erotomania, the drive for power or the drive for pleasure.'”[8]

Video games provide the illusion of power and pleasure. Unlike passive forms of entertainment like movies, television, and music, I am in control of the gaming experience. This is even more true in competitive multiplayer where I have complete control of my character. The end of the story has not been written yet. Because this is my story, I have the power to decide my own fate. But when this happens, human dignity suffers as well because this addiction takes the place of God. And without God, there can be no image of God and thus no basis for human dignity. The real world is replaced by a virtual one which seems even more real than the one we live in now. The people we play against online are not seen as real people, but only exist for our satisfaction when we get a killing spree on them. It is no coincidence that B. F. Skinner, whose psychology has been hugely influential on the gaming industry, also wrote a book called Beyond Freedom and Dignity where he makes the case that we are biological machines whose behaviors are determined by our conditioning.

The Purpose for Our Pain

Pain and suffering are the result of the fall of man into sin. But pain is also part of the providence of God because he is planning to bring a greater good out of the pain of this world. Christians believe by faith that God has a good purpose for the suffering of this world and that one day he will do away with all suffering and evil when Christ returns. The mistake of the “problem of evil” as used against Christian theism is in demanding that God must abolish all evil right now instead of allowing him to do it in his timing.[9] The Bible teaches that both good and bad come from God (Lam 3:37-38). God “works all things according to the counsel of his will” (Eph 1:11). Christians know “that for those who love God all things work together for good, for those who are called according to his purpose” (Rom 8:28). If suffering and death had never existed, then Jesus never could have been crucified for sinners. And the cross of Christ is the eternal plan of God and the theme of heaven and earth (Eph 1:3-7; 3:11; 1 Pet 1:20; Rev 5:9).

God uses suffering to test us and grow our faith in him. As Job was tested and came out with an even greater faith in God, we are called to imitate his faith in the midst of suffering. After the death of his children and the destruction of his property, he said, “Naked I came from my mother’s womb, and naked shall I return. The LORD gave, and the LORD has taken away; blessed be the name of the LORD” (Job 1:21). As the Puritan Thomas Brooks noted, “If God’s hand be not seen in the affliction, the heart will do nothing but fret and rage under affliction.”[10] God uses suffering as a means to discipline us for our good that we may share in his holiness (Heb 12:10). The testing of our faith in suffering is a means God uses to grow our faith in him (Jas 1:2-4; 1 Pet 1:6-7). In the midst of your suffering, remember that this life is the closest unbelievers will ever get to heaven, and the closest Christians will ever get to hell.[11] The addict is getting his heaven on earth now while the Christian looks forward to heaven while denying himself sinful pleasures.

Suffering exists to remind us that we live in a fallen and broken world (Job 36:15). As Lewis says in The Problem of Pain, “God whispers to us in our pleasures, speaks in our conscience, but shouts in our pain: it is His megaphone to rouse a deaf world.”[12] Every death points to the evil of sin. But it is not just this world that is broken, we are broken by our own sin. We must be weaned from the world and its pleasures so that we can take greater pleasure in worshiping God and working to build his kingdom. Because affliction is a tool used by God to wean us from our love for this world that is passing away, those who are in rebellion against God try to numb this pain through sinful pleasure rather than using it as a means to see their need of salvation. The world seeks to silence the voice of God in suffering instead of putting sin to death by trusting in Christ.

Affliction teaches us that this word cannot satisfy. We respond to suffering by either running to the kingdom of Christ or by trying to escape into another one of our own making. In this fictional world of fantasy and pleasure, we never have to confront the evil that is in us. But the truth is there is more evil in the least sin than the greatest affliction (Job 36:21).[13] Suffering and pain should drive us to change. With David, we should say, “It is good for me that I was afflicted, that I might learn your statutes” (Ps 119:71). The pain you are experiencing may be the result of your sinful decisions. Without this pain, you would have no motivation to change. But the pain you are experiencing now is not the pain you deserve.[14] Each of us deserve to be in hell right now for our sins because we have sinned against an infinitely holy God (Rom 3:23). The pain you are experiencing could be so much worse. And by sinning in response to your suffering, you will only make your situation worse. As Brooks explains:

“For by attempting to sin yourselves out of your trouble, you will sin yourself into many troubles, as Jonah and Jacob did; and by labouring to sin yourselves out of less troubles, you will sin yourselves into greater troubles, as Saul did; and by endeavouring to sin yourselves from under outward troubles, you will sin yourselves under inward troubles.”[15]

Afflictions give rise to temptation. They are an occasion to doubt the promises of God. By sinning, you are attempting to get back at God for not giving you what you think you deserve. Emotional pain, mental illness, and depression are often the result of turning from God and trying to live independently of him. They are the consequences of our rebellion against God which result in fear of judgment for our sin. That is why we must look to Christ in faith believing that he has perfectly satisfied the justice and wrath of God for all who trust in him. We do not need to fear God or other Christians or excuse or lie about our sin because it has been dealt with at the cross. We are crucified rebels. His death was our death and his life is our life. You may feel that you are “weary of living, and yet afraid of dying.”[16] But in Christ, we have more than enough hope because he gives us the strength to face tomorrow (Rom 15:13).

This fallen world is not our home. And we glorify God by yearning for the one to come in which there will be no more pain or sadness (Rev 21:4). But the pain you experience now is an opportunity to put to death those secret sins which lie closest to you. Seek deliverance for these sins from the one who has overcome death. When we compare the pleasure of sin to the glory of Christ, the deceptive allure of sin is seen for what it truly is. The Christian world is filled with many testimonies from those who have come out of the bondage to sin, and I pray that your voice will be one of them.[17] In the next chapter, we will look at why video game addiction is so difficult to overcome.


[1]C. S. Lewis, Mere Christianity, HarperCollins Edition (San Francisco, CA: HarperSanFrancisco, 2001), 49.

[2]See the story “Chinese Students Use IV Amino Acids to Study for High-Stakes Tests” at https://www.washingtonpost.com.

[3]See the article “Why Do So Many Japanese Schoolchildren Kill Themselves?” at http://www.newsweek.com.

[4]For an example of this, see the video “Draw My Life” by Boogie2988 on YouTube.

[5]This phenomenon is known as the Call of Duty cycle: 1. Go crazy over how good the new CoD is; 2. Enjoy the game; 3. Hate the game like everybody else; 4. Say that the older game is now the best game; 5. Go crazy about the next CoD trailer.

[6]See the video “If Antidepressant Commercials Were Honest – Honest Ads” by Cracked on YouTube.

[7]For an illustration of this, see the story “Doctors Remove 40 Knives from Man’s Stomach in India” at http://www.cnn.com.

[8]Jeffrey D. Johnson, The Absurdity of Unbelief: A Worldview Apologetic of the Christian Faith (Conway, AR: Free Grace Press, 2016), 198-99, 205.

[9]For the best treatment of the problem of evil, see Randy Alcorn, If God Is Good: Faith in the Midst of Suffering and Evil (Colorado Springs, CO: Multnomah Books, 2009).

[10]Thomas Brooks, The Mute Christian Under the Rod, in A Mute Christian Under the Rod & Apples of Gold, ed. Jay P. Green (Mulberry, IN: Sovereign Grace Publishers, 2001), 19.

[11]See the article “Perspectives for Those Who Are Suffering and Feel They’re Going Through Hell” by Randy Alcorn at http://www.epm.org.

[12]C. S. Lewis, The Problem of Pain, HarperCollins Edition (San Francisco, CA: HarperSanFrancisco, 2001), 91.

[13]Brooks, The Mute Christian Under the Rod, 39.

[14]Ibid., 49.

[15]Ibid., 44.

[16]Thomas Brooks, Heaven on Earth: A Treatise on Christian Assurance (Carlisle, PA: Banner of Truth, 1961), 311.

[17]For some examples of testimonies from those who have been freed from the bondage of sin, see the videos “Why I Am a Christian” by David Wood, “The Plot: Ninja Turtle/Mortal Kombat Star Gets Saved” by Jeff Durbin, and “A Liar and a Coward” by Paul Washer.

Video Game Addiction and the Gospel – Chapter 1: A Word of Clarification

There will be many people who read this book and assume that I am violently opposed to all video games. Nothing could be further from the truth. This is a book about video game addiction, not video games in themselves. Gaming can be an enjoyable pastime that brings friends and family together. Some of my greatest memories come from playing video games. Games have a great power for good, but also the potential for great harm. They can isolate people from one another and destroy relationships when gaming become an idol that consumes the life of those who worship them. The real world can easily be exchanged for a virtual one.

Distinguishing between video games and video game addiction can be difficult because many games are designed to be as addictive as possible. The failure to distinguish between the two ends up resulting in an all-or-nothing attitude where either video games are seen as inherently destructive or the crisis of video game addiction is ignored or dismissed since there are so many other addictions that are more dangerous.

The Mistakes of Video Game Critics

A large portion of the criticisms raised against video games come from people who have little or no experience actually playing them. The result is that the game becomes the object of criticism rather than the person who is addicted to them. This subtle move shifts the burden of responsibility from the addict to what he is addicted to. It is the same temptation that drives gun control legislation where the gun is seen at fault in the crime instead of all of the blame falling on the one who pulled the trigger. Just as guns do not fire themselves, games do not play themselves.

One of the more notorious critics of video games is Jack Thompson who compares violent video games to “murder simulators” that are training our children to kill. He argues that the vibrations of the controller when shooting are a form of behavior modification derived from the research of B. F. Skinner to condition us into thinking that shooting guns is pleasurable. But the reality is that controller vibration was invented as a gimmick to increase the immersiveness of games. The vast majority of gamers who are skilled at first-person shooter games turn off vibration because it interferes with their accuracy when aiming. You cannot maintain pinpoint thumbstick precision when the controller is constantly vibrating. The only people who keep vibration on are those who don’t know any better. The psychology of Skinner is at play in video game addiction, but not in the exact way he thinks.

But Thompson is correct in his realization that violent media can have a desensitizing effect, especially on children who have a difficult time distinguishing fantasy from reality. But if we are going to criticize violence in video games, we need to be equally critical of the fictional violence in movies and television. Railing against violence in video games is sometimes nothing more than an appeal to concerned parents to drum up political support before an election. Leland Yee was one such outspoken voice against violent video games until he went to prison for weapons trafficking.[1] While he claimed to be against violence in the virtual world, he apparently had no problem with violence in the real one. These voices are popular because they give added justification to parents who need to take away their children’s gaming collection because it is interfering with school: not only are these games addictive, but they also cause violence. Blaming the game also reinforces the belief that the problem is not with innocent little Johnny, but with the games that have corrupted him.

Another mistake that is made in critiquing video games is treating them as if they are mere toys for children. There was a time when this was true, but that day has long since passed. Video games have grown up with their player base and the average gamer is in his thirties. Games are designed to be as immersive as possible and every form of entertainment is a kind of escapism to flee from the pain and mundaneness of life. If we are going to criticize video games for promoting escapism, we need to be consistent and critique all digital entertainment and sporting events for this as well.[2] With the rise of virtual reality headsets, video games are becoming more immersive than ever. Games are captivating because they rely upon the suspension of disbelief which virtual reality does a better job of than traditional gaming. Virtual reality more easily allows you to pretend that you are entering a fantasy world where you are in control of your destiny. Many games are taking advantage of the increased graphical fidelity of modern game consoles by blurring the lines between pornography and video games and no Christian has any business playing these games.

Many of the criticisms raised against video game addiction do not understand the nature of this addiction. A large portion of video game addicts are in denial that they have any problem and many of those who admit they have a problem do not understand why they are addicted. I have discovered from my own experience that video game addiction revolves around four main components: community, identity, goal replacement, and pain numbing.

1.   Community: Video game addiction is not so much a power fantasy as it is about being part of an online community. The main reason why addicts of massively multiplayer online games (MMOs) continue to renew their subscription is because not doing so would alienate them from all of the friends they have made while playing it. To leave the game would be to leave the community of their friends. They may not have many close friendships outside of gaming and to stop playing online games would be to abandon the closest relationships they have. We all need friendship to be complete and healthy human beings. We are made for community.[3]

2.   Identity: Their identity as a person has become so closely associated with their online profile that to abandon online gaming would be to abandon part of who they are. Their value as a person is tied to the gaming achievements they have accomplished. This gives them a sense of self-worth and dignity because they have done what few others have. It is something that distinguishes them from everyone else and the record of their gaming achievements is uploaded to YouTube as proof of the great feats they have accomplished.

3.   Goal Replacement: Video games provide an easy way to feel accomplished and gain satisfaction by overcoming obstacles. Video games are a surefire way to secure the release of dopamine that brings pleasure and temporary contentment. Video game addiction can become a replacement for accomplishing goals in real life by exchanging them for ones in a virtual world. This is especially appealing for those who struggle to accomplish goals in real life because of the rejection of others and the desire to be in control of their own destiny.

4.   Pain Numbing: The easy release of dopamine through video games and other forms of entertainment numbs the pain of life by taking us out of this world and transporting us to another where we can forget about our problems. Rather than actually dealing with the root issues behind our misery, we run from them. The more time that the addict spends in this world of fantasy, the less time he has to be thinking about the miserable condition he finds himself in. For those who believe their condition is hopeless, video games may be the only way they can cope with the emotional pain they are experiencing.

The Mistakes of Video Game Addiction Therapists

In medicine, a wrong diagnosis can be fatal. If a disease is misdiagnosed, the prescribed cure can do more harm than good and the underlying cause of the disease is left untreated. The problem with secular video game addiction therapy is that it does not have the gospel. If the Christian message is true, then addiction is fundamentally a sin problem and the only solution for sin is the transforming power of the gospel. Only the gospel has the power to transform the heart of a rebel sinner into a worshiper of God. Video game addiction is not merely unhealthy and a poor use of time, but a sinful act of rebellion against God by turning something in creation into an idol and worshiping it instead of the one true God who alone is worthy of worship. The Apostle Paul writes:

“For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who by their unrighteousness suppress the truth. For what can be known about God is plain to them, because God has shown it to them. For his invisible attributes, namely, his eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly perceived, ever since the creation of the world, in the things that have been made. So they are without excuse. For although they knew God, they did not honor him as God or give thanks to him, but they became futile in their thinking, and their foolish hearts were darkened. Claiming to be wise, they became fools, and exchanged the glory of the immortal God for images resembling mortal man and birds and animals and reptiles” (Romans 1:18-23).

All sin is an exchange where we choose to worship something in creation rather than God for whom we were made. But if we choose not to worship God, we will worship something else because we are by nature worshipers. Worship is an identity before it is an activity.[4] Addiction is fundamentally a worship disorder.[5] Addicts are looking to creation to find lasting satisfaction instead of the creator who made them. Secular addiction therapy cannot deal with the root problem of rebellion against God, but can only treat symptoms. That is why it is essential that we deal with the underlying issue behind the addiction, otherwise, we will just be treating symptoms instead of addressing the heart issue causing the addiction. If we do not, then the addict may just be exchanging one addictive behavior for another.

The only lasting cure for addiction is trusting in Jesus Christ and repentance from sin. We are in need of not only a new set of behaviors, we need a new heart and a new nature. It is our heart that determines our desires: “For out of the heart come evil thoughts, murder, adultery, sexual immorality, theft, false witness, slander” (Matt 15:19). We must be born again. We need God to take out our heart of stone and give us a heart of flesh (Ezek 36:26-27). And this only happens through the proclamation of the good news about Jesus (Jas 1:18). What people ultimately need is for Jesus Christ to give them a new heart to conquer the cravings of sin. For those who are already Christians, they must cultivate a deeper love for Christ and a deeper lover for others. Addiction is inherently selfish because it flows from self-directed love rather than the other-centered love displayed in Christ’s giving of himself for sinners. The key for change is found in union and communion with Christ as we learn to find our joy in him instead of the fleeting pleasures of sin (Heb 11:25).

The Purpose of This Book

I write this book to serve as a warning and to share with you how the gospel liberates us from the bondage of addiction. It is written for those who know they need help and for friends and parents of those who are addicts. It is also designed to help Christian counselors understand how video game addiction works and how to apply the transforming power of the gospel to those who are held captive by it. While the main focus of this book is devoted to helping those who are addicted to gaming, the same biblical principles can be used to treat any addiction.

I admit that I am not an original thinker. This book is filled with many quotations from the Puritans which God used to help change my heart and rediscover the beauty of Christ. You should not have to read hundreds of books to glean the best sayings from the wisest Christians of the past. Because most gamers are not readers, the many quotations throughout this book are designed to help make up for the lost time not spent reading the best writings of Christians.

Video game addiction is alluring because it promises membership in a community, but the gospel gives us a family in the church with whom we will be forever. Gaming promises us an online identity in which we can boast, but Christians find their identity in Christ with whom they are inseparably united. Games can give us the illusion of accomplishing goals, but God has given to each Christian a vocation in which they are called to further advance the kingdom of Christ instead of building their own. Addiction promises to numb our pain, but this numbing sensation can only last for so long. One day you must wake up and face the consequences of your poor decisions. But in Christ, we find lasting satisfaction through the worship of him alone.

A Word to Video Game Developers

Please do not misinterpret this book to mean that you need to quit your job. You have an obligation to provide for your family and be salt and light in a dying world. We need more Christians in the video game industry, not less. How can there ever be a reformation of the entertainment industry if Christians flee it? You have an opportunity to speak truth to a large audience and build friendships with those in need of Christ. Video games can be an enjoyable social experience that brings people together.

While you may not be personally responsible for those who turn your products into idols, you have an obligation to avoid manipulative and exploitative game design decisions that prey on the addictive behaviors of certain gamers. Each of us is responsible before God for our own sins, but we should not do anything that causes someone else to sin. As Jesus said, “Whoever causes one of these little ones who believe in me to sin, it would be better for him to have a great millstone fastened around his neck and to be drowned in the depth of the sea” (Matt 18:6). Instead of designing games that glorify violence and sexual immorality, design games that capture the themes of Scripture and tell compelling stories.

Make more family-friendly games that are appropriate for all ages. Make games that create social experiences. Do not exploit your fan base and always treat your customers with respect. The Skinner box that takes advantage of them needs to stay dead and buried. The only hope for them and for us is the transforming power of God’s grace and I pray that this work will be used by God to help you see what is of eternal value and what is not. May God use this book to help you find hope in Christ instead of in games which are passing away.

Chapter 2


[1]See the article “Former State Sen. Leland Yee Sent to Prison for 5 Years in Gun-Running, ‘Shrimp Boy’ Case” at http://www.polygon.com.

[2]Both of these are combined in the world of professional gaming which is becoming a billion-dollar industry. See the National Geographic documentary StarCraft: World Cyber Games 2005. For a list of some of the prize pools, see http://www.esportsearnings.com.

[3]See the video “Addiction” by Kurzgesagt – In a Nutshell on YouTube.

[4]See the article “Worship Everyday” by Paul David Tripp at http://www.paultripp.com.

[5]See the article “Redeemed Rebels: A Biblical Approach to Addiction” by Jeff Durbin at http://chalcedon.edu.

The Salvation of Dying Infants in the Early Church

The predominant belief of the Western church after Augustine is that infants who die unbaptized would be condemned to hell. However, this was not the view of the earliest Christians:

“And when a child has been born to one of them, they give thanks to God; and if moreover it happen to die in childhood, they give thanks to God the more, as for one who has passed through the world without sins. And further if they see that any one of them dies in his ungodliness or in his sins, for him they grieve bitterly, and sorrow as for one who goes to meet his doom” (Aristides, Apology, Chapter 15).

“Yet not all who rise again are to be judged: for if only a just judgment were the cause of the resurrection, it would of course follow that those who had done neither evil nor good — namely, very young children — would not rise again; but seeing that all are to rise again, those who have died in infancy as well as others” (Athenagoras, On the Resurrection of the Dead, Chapter 14).

“And they who believed from the twelfth mountain, which was white, are the following: they are as infant children, in whose hearts no evil originates; nor did they know what wickedness is, but always remained as children. Such accordingly, without doubt, dwell in the kingdom of God, because they defiled in nothing the commandments of God; but they remained like children all the days of their life in the same mind. All of you, then, who shall remain steadfast, and be as children, without doing evil, will be more honored than all who have been previously mentioned; for all infants are honorable before God, and are the first persons with Him. Blessed, then, are ye who put away wickedness from yourselves, and put on innocence. As the first of all will you live unto God” (Shepherd of Hermas, Similitude 9 29:1-3).

“He, since He was Himself an infant, so arranging it that human infants should be martyrs, slain, according to the Scriptures, for the sake of Christ, who was born in Bethlehem of Judah, in the city of David” (Irenaeus, Against Heresies, Book 3, Chapter 16, Section 4).

“And again, who are they that have been saved and received the inheritance? Those, doubtless, who do believe God, and who have continued in His love; as did Caleb [the son] of Jephunneh and Joshua [the son] of Nun, and innocent children, who have had no sense of evil” (Irenaeus, Against Heresies, Book 4, Chapter 28, Section 3).

“I must compel you to determine (what you mean by Hades), which of its two regions, the region of the good or of the bad. If you mean the bad, (all I can say is, that) even now the souls of the wicked deserve to be consigned to those abodes; if you mean the good, why should you judge to be unworthy of such a resting-place the souls of infants and of virgins, and those which, by reason of their condition in life were pure and innocent” (Tertullian, A Treatise on the Soul, Chapter 56).

“The Creator, on the contrary, let loose bears against children, in order to avenge His prophet Elisha, who had been mocked by them. This antithesis is impudent enough, since it throws together things so different as infants and children, — an age still innocent, and one already capable of discretion — able to mock, if not to blaspheme. As therefore God is a just God, He spared not impious children, exacting as He does honor for every time of life, and especially, of course, from youth. And as God is good, He so loves infants as to have blessed the midwives in Egypt, when they protected the infants of the Hebrews which were in peril from Pharaoh’s command. Christ therefore shares this kindness with the Creator” (Tertullian, Against Marcion, Book 4, Chapter 23).

“Let them become Christians when they have become able to know Christ. Why does the innocent period of life hasten to the ‘remission of sins?’” (Tertullian, On Baptism, Chapter 18).

Problems with Theological Inclusivism

Here are the chapters for my work refuting theological inclusivism and defending the necessity of believing in the gospel of Jesus Christ for the salvation of sinners:

Part 1: Introduction

Part 2: The Positions in the Debate

Part 3: What Is the Gospel?

Part 4: The Emotional Pain this Question Brings

Part 5: The Necessity of the Gospel

Part 6: The Depravity of Fallen Man

Part 7: The First Gospel Message

Part 8: The Unevangelized Are Without God and Without Hope

Part 9: Those Who Do Not Know

Part 10: What Does It Mean to Be a Christian?

Part 11: Romans 1:18-25

Part 12: Romans 2:12

Part 13: Romans 10:13-18

Part 14: The Elect Do Not Remain in Ignorance

Part 15: Inclusivism Leads to Pluralism

Part 16: Do Jews Need to Believe the Gospel to Be Saved?

Part 17: A Common Objection

Part 18: Hell as Eternal Conscious Torment

Part 19: God’s Exhaustive Knowledge of the Future

Part 20: Our Response to the Necessity of the Gospel

Part 21: Moral Objections to the Necessity of the Gospel

Part 22: Holy Pagans?

Part 23: Dreams and Visions

Part 24: What about Infants and Unborn Children Who Die?

Part 25: Biblical Objections to the Necessity of the Gospel

Part 26: The Example of Job

Part 27: The Salvation of Old Testament Saints

Part 28: Deuteronomy 4:19

Part 29: Matthew

Part 30: John

Part 31: The Case of Cornelius

Part 32: Acts 17

Part 33: Romans

Part 34: 1 Peter 3:19-20 and Postmortem Evangelism

Part 35: The Love of God

Part 36: The Saving Will of God

Part 37: The Extent of the Atonement

Part 38: A Cumulative Case for the Necessity of the Gospel

Problems with Theological Inclusivism – Part 38: A Cumulative Case for the Necessity of the Gospel

1. All who believe in Christ will be saved but everyone who does not believe will be condemned for their sins: “Whoever believes in him is not condemned, but whoever does not believe is condemned already, because he has not believed in the name of the only Son of God” (John 3:18).

2. All of those who do not obey Christ will not see eternal life: “Whoever believes in the Son has eternal life; whoever does not obey the Son shall not see life, but the wrath of God remains on him” (John 3:36).

3. Those who are unevangelized are without excuse because they have already rejected the one true God and turned to idols (Rom 1:18-23).

4. People go to hell because they are sinners in rebellion against God, not because they have rejected a presentation of the gospel (Matt 5:29-30; Rev 20:12-15).

5. Because of the fall of Adam into sin, we are all born into the world with no desire or moral ability to seek God, do good, please him, obey his law, or believe the gospel (John 6:44; Rom 1:18; 3:10-18; 5:10; 8:7-9; Eph 2:1-5)

6. Because of the depravity of fallen man, we must be born again through the message of the gospel in order to trust in Christ alone for salvation (John 3:3-8; Eph 1:13; Jas 1:18; 1 Pet 1:3, 23-25; 1 John 5:1).

7. The essence of eternal life is knowing God and his Messiah and therefore those who do not know the Messiah cannot have eternal life: “And this is eternal life, that they know you the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom you have sent” (John 17:3).

8. The Spirit’s work in salvation is to point people to Jesus Christ. Therefore, where Christ is not known or rejected, the Spirit is not savingly present (John 15:26; 16:14; 1 John 4:2-3).

9. It is only those who believe that Jesus is the Son of God who overcome the world: “Who is it that overcomes the world except the one who believes that Jesus is the Son of God?” (1 John 5:5).

10. Those who are unevangelized have no hope and are without God: “Remember that you were at that time separated from Christ, alienated from the commonwealth of Israel and strangers to the covenants of promise, having no hope and without God in the world” (Eph 2:12).

11. Those who do not believe the gospel have no hope of salvation: “But we do not want you to be uninformed, brothers, about those who are asleep, that you may not grieve as others do who have no hope” (1 Thess 4:13).

12. All of the Galatians before their salvation were enslaved by false gods: “Formerly, when you did not know God, you were enslaved to those that by nature are not gods” (Gal 4:8).

13. God must come to the nations through the gospel because the lost by their wisdom cannot know God: “For since, in the wisdom of God, the world did not know God through wisdom, it pleased God through the folly of what we preach to save those who believe” (1 Cor 1:21).

14. Those who are unevangelized will be punished at Christ’s return with a lesser degree of punishment in hell rather than being given an opportunity to be saved: “But the one who did not know, and did what deserved a beating, will receive a light beating. Everyone to whom much was given, of him much will be required, and from him to whom they entrusted much, they will demand the more” (Luke 12:48).

15. It is only those who believe in Christ who are children of God: “But to all who did receive him, who believed in his name, he gave the right to become children of God” (John 1:12).

16. Those who do not believe in Jesus will die in their sins: “I told you that you would die in your sins, for unless you believe that I am he you will die in your sins” (John 8:24).

17. Only those who abide in the teachings of Christ are his disciples: “So Jesus said to the Jews who had believed in him, ‘If you abide in my word, you are truly my disciples’” (John 8:31).

18. Those who do not obey the gospel are not part of the household of God: “For it is time for judgment to begin at the household of God; and if it begins with us, what will be the outcome for those who do not obey the gospel of God?” (1 Peter 4:17).

19. Only those who feed on Christ by faith have eternal life: “Truly, truly, I say to you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you have no life in you” (John 6:53).

20. Jesus only prayed for those who believe in him through the gospel message in his high priestly prayer. If the unevangelized are saved, then Jesus did not pray for them: “I do not ask for these only, but also for those who will believe in me through their word” (John 17:20).

21. All sinners who die without the special revelation of God’s Word will perish: “For all who have sinned without the law will also perish without the law, and all who have sinned under the law will be judged by the law” (Rom 2:12).

22. Preaching is essential for people to hear the gospel and be saved by calling on the name of the Lord. Every form of inclusivism must break this chain in some way (Rom 10:9-18).

23. God does not leave his elect in ignorance, but brings the gospel to them so that they might be saved: “But we ought always to give thanks to God for you, brothers beloved by the Lord, because God chose you as the first fruits to be saved, through sanctification by the Spirit and belief in the truth. To this he called you through our gospel, so that you may obtain the glory of our Lord Jesus Christ” (2 Thess 2:13-14).

24. All who reject the message of the cross are perishing in their sins: “For the word of the cross is folly to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God” (1 Cor 1:18).

25. Theological inclusivism is inherently inconsistent because it does not take into account that every member of an unreached people group who has not heard the gospel is a member of a false religion. Therefore, to say that the unevangelized can be saved apart from believing the gospel is to say that members of false religions can be saved. That is, they are saved as practicing members of a false religion believing in things that are directly contrary to the gospel.

26. If people are saved as practicing members of false religions, then they die believing in false doctrine and worshiping a false god or gods. To worship any God besides the Lord is idolatry and no idolater has eternal life: “Do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: neither the sexually immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor men who practice homosexuality, nor thieves, nor the greedy, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God” (1 Cor 6:9-10).

27. To reject the presentation of the gospel is to reject Christ and to reject Christ is to reject God: “The one who hears you hears me, and the one who rejects you rejects me, and the one who rejects me rejects him who sent me” (Luke 10:16).

28. Those who are the sheep of Christ listen to his voice and follow him: “But you do not believe because you are not part of my flock. My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, and they follow me” (John 10:26-27).

29. The sheep of Christ do not listen to false teachers: “All who came before me are thieves and robbers, but the sheep did not listen to them” (John 10:8).

30. The religious worship of false religions is not their innocent seeking after God, but is a manifestation of their rejection of God and is demonic in nature: “No, I imply that what pagans sacrifice they offer to demons and not to God. I do not want you to be participants with demons” (1 Cor 10:20).

31. If a person does not come to Christ, it shows that God did not give him to the Son: “All that the Father gives me will come to me, and whoever comes to me I will never cast out” (John 6:37).

32. All who reject Christ will be condemned on the last day: “The one who rejects me and does not receive my words has a judge; the word that I have spoken will judge him on the last day” (John 12:48).

33. Those who reject the gospel message show themselves to be unworthy of eternal life: “And Paul and Barnabas spoke out boldly, saying, ‘It was necessary that the word of God be spoken first to you. Since you thrust it aside and judge yourselves unworthy of eternal life, behold, we are turning to the Gentiles’” (Acts 13:46).

34. No one who rejects the message of salvation will escape the wrath of God: “For since the message declared by angels proved to be reliable and every transgression or disobedience received a just retribution, how shall we escape if we neglect such a great salvation? It was declared at first by the Lord, and it was attested to us by those who heard” (Heb 2:2-3).

35. All of “those who do not know God” and “those who do not obey the gospel of our Lord Jesus” will be condemned to hell when Christ returns (2 Thess 1:7-10).

36. Jesus is only “the source of eternal salvation” to those who obey him (Heb 5:9).

37. Only those who confess Jesus are from God: “And every spirit that does not confess Jesus is not from God. This is the spirit of the antichrist, which you heard was coming and now is in the world already” (1 John 4:3).

38. Only those who listen to the apostolic message know God: “We are from God. Whoever knows God listens to us; whoever is not from God does not listen to us. By this we know the Spirit of truth and the spirit of error” (1 John 4:6).

39. Only those who have the Son have life: “Whoever has the Son has life; whoever does not have the Son of God does not have life” (1 John 5:12).

40. Only those who abide in the teachings of Christ have God: “Everyone who goes on ahead and does not abide in the teaching of Christ, does not have God. Whoever abides in the teaching has both the Father and the Son” (2 John 1:9).

41. All of those who deny the Son do not have the Father: “No one who denies the Son has the Father. Whoever confesses the Son has the Father also” (1 John 2:23).

42. Whoever does not believe in the gospel is calling God a liar: “Whoever believes in the Son of God has the testimony in himself. Whoever does not believe God has made him a liar, because he has not believed in the testimony that God has borne concerning his Son” (1 John 5:10).

43. Those who do not honor the Son equally with the Father do not honor the Father: “That all may honor the Son, just as they honor the Father. Whoever does not honor the Son does not honor the Father who sent him” (John 5:23).

44. Those who reject Christ do not have God’s word abiding in them: “You do not have his word abiding in you, for you do not believe the one whom he has sent” (John 5:38)

45. All of those who do not believe the truth will be condemned: “In order that all may be condemned who did not believe the truth but had pleasure in unrighteousness” (2 Thess 2:12).

46. All those who reject the message of Jesus will be condemned: “See that you do not refuse him who is speaking. For if they did not escape when they refused him who warned them on earth, much less will we escape if we reject him who warns from heaven” (Heb 12:25).

47. Only those who abide in Christ will have no reason to shrink from him in shame at his coming: “And now, little children, abide in him, so that when he appears we may have confidence and not shrink from him in shame at his coming” (1 John 2:28).

48. Those who do not abide in Christ will be cast into hell: “If anyone does not abide in me he is thrown away like a branch and withers; and the branches are gathered, thrown into the fire, and burned” (John 15:6).

49. All those who go back to Judaism after professing faith in Christ will be condemned to hell: “If they then fall away, since they are crucifying once again the Son of God to their own harm and holding him up to contempt. For land that has drunk the rain that often falls on it, and produces a crop useful to those for whose sake it is cultivated, receives a blessing from God. But if it bears thorns and thistles, it is worthless and near to being cursed, and its end is to be burned” (Heb 6:6-8).

50. Only those who endure to the end in the Christian faith demonstrate that they have come to share in Christ: “For we have come to share in Christ, if indeed we hold our original confidence firm to the end” (Heb 3:14).

Problems with Theological Inclusivism – Part 37: The Extent of the Atonement

If Christ died on the cross for all men indiscriminately, then why are not all men given a chance to be saved? As Pinnock argues, “If Christ died for all, while yet sinners, the opportunity must be given for all to register a decision about what was done for them.”[1] Why would Christ die for someone if that person never has a chance to be saved? This is one reason why Moses Amyraut, who modified the theology of Calvinism to include universal atonement, believed in inclusivism with the Arminians.[2] The Puritan Richard Baxter, who was in agreement with Amyraut on the atonement, affirmed an agnostic position on the fate of the unevangelized in contrast to the Calvinistic Puritans.[3]

There are two different ways to answer this argument. The first is to point out that it does not logically follow that if Christ died for all men that all men must be given an opportunity to be saved. This is because if universal atonement is true, then it is also true that Christ died for those who were already in hell when he was on the cross. But because those in hell have no opportunity to be saved even though Christ died for them, it does not follow that all those Christ dies for must be given an opportunity to be saved.

The second solution is to affirm that the extent of the atonement is limited to those who are saved. This means that only the sins of the elect were imputed to Christ on the cross. By his death, Christ actually secured the salvation of those he died for rather than making their salvation possible.

In the debate over the extent of the atonement, the decisive text is Romans 8:32 where Paul says, “He who did not spare his own Son but gave him up for us all, how will he not also with him graciously give us all things?” Paul declares that God will give all things to those for whom he gave up his Son. If God has given us the greater, how will he not also give us the lesser? If he has given us his very own Son, how will he not also give us salvation? The great truth of Christ’s death on behalf of those who trust in him is the foundation for the believer’s assurance of salvation. Because Christ has died for me, I cannot be lost because Christ has paid the penalty for my sins.

But if there are some for whom the Father gave up his Son who will not be given all things, then Paul’s argument is invalid since, as John Gill argues, “it might be replied to him, that God might deliver up his Son for persons, and yet not freely give all things with him to them.”[4] If universal atonement is true, then the Holy Spirit had Paul write an argument that is logically invalid. But God, from whom logic comes, cannot make invalid arguments. A universal atonement undermines assurance of salvation because Christ’s death for me is the foundation for my assurance. Because Christ paid the penalty for my sins, I know I will never be punished for them. But if Christ died for those in hell just as much for me, how do I know that I will not have to pay for my sins one day as well?

Other arguments that could be given in favor of definite atonement include the death of Christ for his bride as a display of the unique love Christ has for the church alone (Eph 5:25-27), that the atonement perfects those it is made for in contrast to the imperfect sacrifices of the Old Testament (Heb 9:12; 10:1-4, 10-14), that those who died with Christ when he died will all live with him (2 Tim 2:11), that the redeemed are ransomed out of every people group on earth (Rev 5:9), and that not all men are redeemed by Christ from the earth (Rev 14:3-4).

But if Christ only died for those who are saved, how do we understand those passages which teach that Christ died for the whole world like John 1:29 and 1 John 2:2? Calvinists have never denied that Christ died for the world, but they understand the term qualitatively rather than quantitatively. The Bible does not just teach that Jesus died for the world, but that he is the savior of the world (John 4:42; 1 John 4:14). If “world” here means every single individual who has ever lived, then that would result in universalism. As the savior of the world, he is the savior of all without distinction (all people groups regardless of ethnicity, gender, age, or economic status) but not the savior of all without exception (universalism).

“World” is not a quantitative term meaning every single person who has ever lived, lives, or will live, but a qualitative one meaning every people group in the world. Christ takes away the sins of every people group because representatives from every nation will be among the redeemed (Rev 5:9). This is in contrast to the particularism of the Old Testament when God was primarily focused on the people of Israel. Now the scope of salvation is for all people groups, both Jews and Gentiles. Only those who are saved have their sins taken away because they alone are saved from the consequences of their sins. Christ is the savior of the world because he actually saves people from every tribe, language, people, and nation. He is the propitiation for all groups of people.

In 1 John 2:2, “Our sins” is specifically referring to the sins of John and his disciples whom he refers to as “my little children” (2:1). Christ is not only the propitiation for John and his disciples living in Asia Minor, but for every tribe, language, people, and nation. Christ’s death is not just for them, but for all people groups. Compare this verse to its parallel in John 11:50-52. The work of propitiation is the work of an advocate (2:1). Notice that “he is” is in the present tense. John is describing the present intercessory work of Christ in the Holy of Holies where propitiation takes place. He is now at the right hand of God presenting his finished sacrifice before the Father. To be the propitiation for their sins means that he is now interceding for them and turning away the wrath of God because he bore that wrath perfectly on the cross. Christ’s present work of propitiation is the ground for our assurance of salvation. The Father will not punish us for our sins because Christ was punished for them. The good news of the gospel assumes the impossibility of double jeopardy for those who trust in Christ.[5]

Part 38


[1]Pinnock, A Wideness in God’s Mercy, 157.

[2]Amar Djaballah, “A Historical Survey of Moïse Amyraut’s Brief Traitté de la Predestination,” in From Heaven He Came and Sought Her: Definite Atonement in Historical, Biblical, Theological, and Pastoral Perspective, ed. David Gibson and Jonathan Gibson (Wheaton, IL: Crossway, 2013), 181.

[3]William G. T. Shedd, Dogmatic Theology, 3rd ed., ed. Alan W. Gomes (Phillipsburg, NJ: P&R Publishing, 2003), 340.

[4]John Gill, The Cause of God and Truth (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Book House, 1980), 102. For an exegetical defense of definite atonement, see Gary Long, Definite Atonement (Rochester, NY: Backus Book Publishers, 1977). See also J. I. Packer’s “Introductory Essay” to John Owen’s The Death of Death in the Death of Christ and Charles Spurgeon’s sermon “Particular Redemption” at https://www.monergism.com. For an overview of Calvinism, see Five Points: Towards a Deeper Experience of God’s Grace by John Piper at http://www.desiringgod.org.

[5]Sinclair B. Ferguson, “‘Blessèd Assurance, Jesus Is Mine’?,” in From Heaven He Came and Sought Her: Definite Atonement in Historical, Biblical, Theological, and Pastoral Perspective, ed. David Gibson and Jonathan Gibson (Wheaton, IL: Crossway, 2013), 628.

Problems with Theological Inclusivism – Part 36: The Saving Will of God

If God wants everyone to be saved, then why does he allow people to die having never heard the gospel if believing in it is the only way to be saved? Arminianism asserts that the ultimate reason why not all are saved is because of the free will of man. Not all are saved because not all exercise their free will to believe the gospel message. But the problem is that there are many who never have an opportunity to hear the gospel in this life. How can their free will response to the gospel be the determinative factor in whether they are saved or damned if they never have a chance to hear the gospel? This is why Arminians have historically believed in theological inclusivism.[i] The commitment to the supremacy of man’s free will in salvation is why those who are non-Calvinists have no consistent response to inclusivism.

This is also why Roman Catholicism, with its commitment to man’s free will and human merit, eventually embraced inclusivism forcing it to redefine what “No Salvation Outside the Church” means and undermining papal infallibility in the process. The doctrine of “No Salvation Outside the Church” as taught by the church fathers only makes sense within Reformed theology demonstrating who the real heirs of the early church are.

A similar shift took place in the theology of Clark Pinnock. At one time, he was a committed Calvinist. But once he embraced the belief that a true Christian can lose his salvation, the other four points of Calvinism had to go as well. And with Calvinism went exclusivism. Then to maintain man’s libertarian free will, he realized that God’s exhaustive knowledge of the future had to go too because if God knows the future, then the future is already determined and unchangeable from his perspective. And because a loving God would never allow those he loves to be tormented forever in hell, he redefined hell as a cessation of existence. His entire theological journey is the result of working out the implications of his departure from Calvinism.[ii]

But the solution to this argument for inclusivism is to recognize that just as God has degrees of love, he likewise has degrees of willing. God has two kinds of willing that we spoke of earlier: his revealed will of command and his secret will of decree. It is true that there is a sense in which God desires the salvation of all men indiscriminately because he commands all men to repent (Luke 7:30; John 5:34; Acts 17:30; Rom 2:4; 1 John 3:23). With respect to his love and mercy, he does not take delight in the death of sinners (Ezek 18:23; 33:11). God is slow to anger and abounding in steadfast love because he does not bring judgment upon sinners right away (Exod 34:6). His desire to save all is with respect to his revealed will or will of command whereby he demands of all men faith and repentance (Isa 45:22). But God’s secret will or will of decree is that only the elect will be saved.

The distinctions that exist within the will of God can be illustrated by his decree to bring judgment upon Israel for their sins. God says that he “does not willingly afflict or grieve the children of men” because he is a God of love (Lam 3:33). Yet at the same time, the author says that all things good and bad come from the decree of God:

“Who has spoken and it came to pass, unless the Lord has commanded it? Is it not from the mouth of the Most High that good and bad come?” (Lam 3:37-38).

His will to punish Israel for their sin is in accordance with his eternal decree and rooted in his just character. Yet he takes no pleasure in the death of the wicked in accordance with his gracious character (Ezek 33:11). But at the same time, the Bible says that God does take pleasure in the judgment of sinners because it is in accordance with his righteous nature which must punish sin (Deut 28:63). These two passages appear to contradict each other. But the tension is resolved when we realize that they are speaking from the perspective of different attributes of God. He does not willingly bring affliction with respect to his mercy and grace but he does willingly bring them with respect to his justice and sovereignty.

The difference between God’s will of command and his will of decree is seen in the crucifixion of Christ. God forbids murder (Exod 20:13). Yet he ordained the death of the innocent Son of God while still holding those behind it responsible for their sins based on the evil desires of their heart (Acts 4:27-28). His will of command is that it is always wrong to kill an innocent person, but his will of decree is that Jesus would die for our sins. The same is true in the story of Joseph who was sold into slavery by his brothers. God’s will of command is that it is always wrong to kidnap another person and sell them into slavery (Deut 24:7; 1 Tim 1:10). But his will of decree is that Joseph would be sold into slavery so that the people of Israel would be saved (Gen 50:20). Yet God’s decree does not change the fact that what they did to Joseph was evil. So likewise, God’s will of command is that all repent and believe in Christ, but his will of decree is that only the elect will. That we cannot fully grasp the difference between the two does not change the Bible’s teaching on election.

Part 37


[i]See the article “Inclusivist Theologians” at https://wesleyanarminian.wordpress.com.

[ii]Clark H. Pinnock, “From Augustine to Arminius: A Pilgrimage in Theology,” in The Grace of God and the Will of Man, ed. Clark H. Pinnock (Bloomington, MN: Bethany House Publishers, 1995), 17.

Problems with Theological Inclusivism – Part 35: The Love of God

If God loves the unevangelized, then why does he allow them to live and die without hearing the gospel if that is their only hope for salvation? As Pinnock argues, “If God really loves the whole world and desires everyone to be saved, it follows logically that everyone must have access to salvation.”[i] His argument is that if exclusivism is true, then God is not all-loving. But because God is all-loving, Calvinism and exclusivism cannot be true.

But the mistake he is making is failing to grasp the distinctions that exist in the display of God’s love. Just as we have different kinds of love based on that person’s relationship to us, so God has different kinds of love based on the relationship of his creatures to him. God can display love in common grace to the lost even though they are under the sentence of his wrath while showing a greater kind of love to those who are saved. Common grace is the universal love of God as demonstrated in creation and providence. He is kind to all and shows mercy to his enemies who only deserve his justice (Ps 145:9; Matt 5:43-48).

Yet God’s love for the church is greater in degree and kind than his love of common grace. It is the love marriage was created to reflect (Eph 5:25). Husbands do not love their wives the same way they love all other women. There is a special kind of love God only has for believers (John 14:21; 15:9-10; Jude 1:21). John, the disciple whom Jesus loved, was more loved by Jesus than the other disciples. God can show degrees of love to his saints while loving them equally in Christ. God’s love displayed in election is a unique and special love given only to his people (Eph 1:4-5). God loves the people of Israel more than any other people group because of his sovereign choice of them (Deut 10:15).

Those who are among the unevangelized are loved by God through common grace, but since those who die as sinners among them are not among his elect, they are not loved with the same kind of love that Christ has for his church. Arminianism refuses to allow any distinctions or degrees in God’s love: he must love all people equally or else he is not loving at all. But this is not how Scripture speaks of God’s love. It is also the same type of argument that universalists use: if God loves everyone, then there can be no hell of eternal conscious torment because a loving God would never send those he loves to hell. The mistake in the argument is failing to grasp that God is both loving and just. He must punish sinners for their sins because he is a holy and righteous God. Likewise, Arminians fail to grasp that God is both loving and sovereign. He has the freedom to display his love as he chooses and we as sinners do not deserve his love. If we did, then salvation would no longer be by grace alone.

Part 36


[i]Pinnock, A Wideness in God’s Mercy, 157.

Problems with Theological Inclusivism – Part 34: 1 Peter 3:19-20 and Postmortem Evangelism

Another take on inclusivism is the belief that people who die without hearing the gospel will have the opportunity to hear it and believe after death. As Pinnock says, “Scripture does not require us to hold that the window of opportunity is slammed shut at death.”[i] The most common passage of Scripture used in favor of postmortem evangelism is 1 Peter 3:19-20:

“In which he went and proclaimed to the spirits in prison, because they formerly did not obey, when God’s patience waited in the days of Noah, while the ark was being prepared, in which a few, that is, eight persons, were brought safely through water.”

Because Peter refers to Christ preaching or proclaiming to the spirits in prison, many argue that those in hell can still hear the gospel and be saved. Another closely related verse is 1 Peter 4:6: “For this is why the gospel was preached even to those who are dead, that though judged in the flesh the way people are, they might live in the spirit the way God does.”

While this is a challenging passage of Scripture, there are several reasons why it cannot be a proof text for postmortem evangelism. The spirits in prison, whether they are angels or humans, are those who disobeyed in Noah’s day. If they are fallen angels, then this cannot be describing postmortem evangelism because angels cannot be saved. But if these are those who were alive during Noah’s day, then they disobeyed in spite of the preaching of Noah who was “a herald of righteousness” (2 Pet 2:5). If they disobeyed the warnings of Noah, then they are not among the unevangelized since a message of judgment was preached to them while they were still alive. In that case, this text would not only teach the postmortem evangelism of the unevangelized, but the postmortem evangelism of those who already have heard the message of God.

Based on the parallels between 1 Peter 3:19 and 4:6, I would interpret this preaching to be that which took place while they were still alive. Those who are in prison in 3:19 are the unbelievers who lived during Noah’s day. Christ preached the gospel to them in his immortal state through Noah when the ark was being built. Now that they are dead, they exist as spirits in hell without physical bodies until the resurrection of the dead (John 5:28-29; 2 Pet 2:9).

But in the case of 4:6, these are those who are dead who responded positively to the preaching of the gospel while they were still alive. This is the same kind of preaching as described in 3:19. Now that they are dead, they “live in the spirit” which is living incorruptibly and immortally in God’s presence as Christ does (1 Pet 3:18). For Christ to be “made alive in the spirit” in 3:18 is for him to be raised incorruptibly, not non-physically.

In contrast to post-mortem evangelism, the Bible teaches that “it is appointed for man to die once, and after that comes judgment” (Heb 9:27). The door of opportunity was slammed shut at death for the rich man in Luke 16 who died and went to hell. Luke 16:26 teaches that no one can cross over from hell to heaven: “And besides all this, between us and you a great chasm has been fixed, in order that those who would pass from here to you may not be able, and none may cross from there to us.” Postmortem evangelism also does not fit in with the many passages which teach that all unbelievers at the second coming of Christ will be damned rather than being given an opportunity to be saved (Luke 17:26-30). If they get no opportunity when Christ returns, why should those who die before then get one?

Another take on postmortem evangelism is what I would call “post-resurrection evangelism.” It teaches that when Christ returns at his second coming, the unevangelized will have an opportunity to hear the gospel and be saved after being raised from the dead.[ii] But the Bible teaches that there will be no more opportunity for salvation then. The paradigm Scripture uses to picture the second coming of Christ is Noah’s flood. Just as no one escaped when the flood came, no unbeliever will escape when Christ returns (Matt 24:38-39). When Christ comes, all sinners will be thrown into hell by the angels (Matt 13:41-42).

At the resurrection, some people will be raised to life and others to judgment (Dan 12:2; John 5:27-29). Jesus does not give us any third category of people who are raised to hear the gospel. Those who are unrighteous are kept under punishment until the day of judgment (2 Pet 2:9). And as we already saw in Luke 12:48, those who do not know their master’s will when Christ returns will be given a lesser punishment in hell rather than having an opportunity to repent. According to Paul, everyone who does not know God (pagans and the unevangelized) and those who do not obey the gospel (everyone who has rejected it) will be cast into hell at Christ’s coming:

“And to grant relief to you who are afflicted as well as to us, when the Lord Jesus is revealed from heaven with his mighty angels in flaming fire, inflicting vengeance on those who do not know God and on those who do not obey the gospel of our Lord Jesus. They will suffer the punishment of eternal destruction, away from the presence of the Lord and from the glory of his might” (2 Thess 1:7-9).

Those who are ethnically Jewish will not get a second chance when Christ returns. Jesus said to the Jewish leaders, “I told you that you would die in your sins, for unless you believe that I am he you will die in your sins” (John 8:24). Jesus taught that whoever rejects him will be judged by his words on the day of judgment: “The one who rejects me and does not receive my words has a judge; the word that I have spoken will judge him on the last day” (John 12:48). Only those who abide in him will have no reason to shrink from him in shame at his coming (1 John 2:28). Those who do not obey the gospel in this life will not get any second chances when Christ returns (Matt 13:40-43; Luke 17:26-30; 1 Thess 5:1-5; 2 Thess 1:7-9; 2:11-12; Rev 3:9).

Revelation 5:9

Another argument for inclusivism is that since Revelation 5:9 says that members from “every tribe and language” will be among the redeemed, that means there must be a way for the unevangelized to be saved because some tribes and languages died out before missionaries arrived. But “every tribe” does not need to mean every possible classification of people throughout world history, only every ethnicity or people group in the world. And “every language” can refer to all the known languages of the world at the time John was writing. But even if the verse is referring to every possible classification of people and every possible language throughout world history, then this would be fulfilled through the salvation of dying infants.

Part 35


[i]Pinnock, A Wideness in God’s Mercy, 171.

[ii]For one example of this, see the video “Ben Witherington: The Destiny of the Unevangelized” by the channel Seedbed on YouTube.

Problems with Theological Inclusivism – Part 33: Romans

Romans 1:19-20

Romans 1 is a foundational passage for understanding how God is just to condemn Gentiles who have never heard the gospel for their sins. But inclusivists use it to argue that the unevangelized can be saved through the knowledge of God as displayed in creation. Paul writes:

“For what can be known about God is plain to them, because God has shown it to them. For his invisible attributes, namely, his eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly perceived, ever since the creation of the world, in the things that have been made. So they are without excuse” (Rom 1:19-20).

Richardson quips that exclusivists fail to take this passage into account in their theology: “In some Exclusivist-leaning commentaries and sermons, Paul’s ‘clearly seen’ and ‘being understood’ in Romans 1:20 end up sounding more like ‘dimly sensed’ and ‘barely perceived.’”[i]

But this argument completely misses the point Paul is making in this chapter and skips over verse 18: “For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who by their unrighteousness suppress the truth.” It is true that God’s existence is “clearly perceived” from the created order. The problem is not with creation, but with fallen man. Though God’s existence is clear, there are many atheists who deny his existence in spite of the overwhelming evidence. The same is true with the unevangelized. They should know from creation that there is only one God, but they universally turn to idols and superstitious religious practices.

Creation alone cannot be the instrument of salvation because man by nature suppresses or holds down the knowledge of God that already has been revealed to him. It is only through the gospel that the Holy Spirit works to bring about regeneration because the Spirit’s work is to glorify Christ (John 16:14; 1 Pet 1:23-25). The Spirit does not work where Christ is not known or rejected (1 John 4:2-6; 5:5).

The purpose of Romans 1 is to demonstrate that pagans are lost and worthy of condemnation even though they do not have access to the gospel because they have already rejected the one true God who has revealed himself in creation. Because they have willfully turned from God to idols, they are worthy of being condemned for their sins regardless if they have heard the gospel or not.

Romans 2:7-10

Another argument is that because Paul says in Romans 2:7 that “those who by patience in well-doing seek for glory and honor and immortality, he will give eternal life” that the unevangelized can be saved by seeking after God apart from a knowledge of the gospel. The problem with this argument is that it proves too much. If Paul is teaching that a person can be saved “by patience in well-doing,” then he would be teaching salvation by works instead of through Christ’s righteousness alone.

Paul is speaking in this passage from the perspective of the law and what a person must do to gain eternal life on the basis of keeping it. Only those who are sinless could possibly be saved by keeping the law and there is no one like this except Jesus Christ. Paul has not yet contrasted the impossibility of meriting eternal life on the basis of the law in Romans 2 with salvation by grace alone in Christ in Romans 3.

Paul says the exact opposite of this in Romans 3:10-12 where he declares that there is no one who is righteous or seeks for God. Romans 2 must be read in light of Romans 3 where the gospel is set forth. Because there is no lost person who does good or seeks for God, salvation must be by faith and not on the basis of the law (Rom 3:20-21). Because we are all sinners, justification must be based on what Christ has done who alone lived in perfect obedience to the Father rather than good works.

Romans 2:14-15

Since all men have been given a conscience by God, which Paul calls the law written on the heart in Romans 2:15, some inclusivists argue that the unevangelized can be saved through the internal law of the heart even though they do not have the external law of Scripture. It is true that the conscience is a gift from God to show us our sin. But sinful man suppresses his conscience and that is why the regenerating work of the Holy Spirit in the gospel is essential for salvation (Rom 1:18; 8:7-9). Gentiles keep the law, but only inconsistently and never for God’s glory. They partially keep it by nature because they are made in God’s image and have a conscience which tells them when they have done something wrong. They then attempt to suppress their conscience and make excuses for their sin (Rom 2:15). Conscience and creation serve to condemn us for our sin and give us a foretaste of the day of judgment, but they can never save us. Even the external law apart from the gospel cannot save.

Romans 10:18

While the original context of Psalm 19:4 is creation, Paul is reappropriating the verse to now speak about the preaching of the gospel instead of creation. The message of the gospel had spread throughout the known Roman world at that time through the Great Commission. The same Greek word translated as “world” in this verse is also used in Luke 2:1 to refer to the Roman census of all the world. It is the known inhabited world, not the entire created world.

Paul does the same thing in Romans 10:6-7 when he reappropriates Deuteronomy 30:12. In its original context, the verse is talking about the law. But Paul reapplies it to the gospel instead of the law. The same reapplication of the Old Testament is seen in Paul’s quotation of Nahum 1:15 in Romans 10:15 to refer to the spread of the gospel. But in its original context, Nahum is talking about messengers who are bringing the message of the defeat of Israel’s enemies.

If Paul is teaching in verse 18 that people can be saved through the created order, then that would make him contradict himself since he just said before this that the lost cannot believe in the one whom they have never heard and they cannot hear about him without someone preaching to them (10:14).

Part 34


[i]Richardson, Heaven Wins, 84.